Lead Generation

  • 5 Key Factors of Successful B2B Lead Generation

    Posted April 9, 2010 By in Lead Generation With | 4 Comments

    I am just putting the finishing touches on my next eBook on Lead Generation – so I wanted to share these five key factors of successful B2B lead generation campaigns.

    But before I  jump into the 5 key elements, I want to share this one important concept with you.

    You are not in the lead generation business – you want sales, not leads.

    Though this seems obvious, struggling lead generation campaigns typically focus on generating leads – and though leads are important, it’s the quality, not quantity, that is critical.

    Think of it this way – let’s assume that your current lead generation efforts cost $100,000 and generate 50,000 leads – that’s a cost per lead of $2.  But if your conversion rate is 10%, that means that 45,000 leads or $90,000 failed to produce your ultimate goal – a sale.

    The Pareto Principle tells us that 80% of your business will come from 20% of your efforts – so identify those activities that are generating the most sales and start investing more resources in them.

    Every business is searching for ways to improve performance and reduce the amount of resources invested in under-performing activities – so here are 5 key factors to successful B2B lead generation…

    1. Accuracy: Know who you need to connect with and how to best deliver what they need and want.  Start with your current ‘best customers’ and find out how they learned about your business and why they selected you over the competition.  Then replicate the process on a larger scale so you can attract more leads that are most like your best customers.
    2. Frequency: The average person is buried under 3,000 promotional messages each day and it typically takes 5 to 7 attempts to cut through that clutter and capture their attention.  Successful lead generation is a process, not a series of one-off campaigns – you need to reach your prospective buyer regularly and build the relationship over time.   Sure, you are chasing this Quarter’s goals – but you also need to set up  opportunities for future Quarters and if you’re targeting the right people, most of them will have future needs to buy.  Make sure you work for them as well as those with immediate needs to buy.
    3. Relevancy: When attempting to process 3,000 promotional offers every day, your buyer is looking for reasons to reduce options – so you need to make sure that when you get your chance, you offer relevant value.  Highly successful lead generation processes understand the importance of tying messages and offers to where the buyer is in the buying process.  For example, earlier in the buying process, the buyer wants information so they can understand options  which is why successful lead generation processes focus on white papers, webinars, events instead of “Buy now, Save 20%”.
    4. Quality, then Quantity: I hope I made this point clear above – quantity of leads might keep everyone busy but the goal is being productive and profitable so focus on quality leads first, then spend more time and money on what produces sales.
    5. Test.  Measure.  Analyze.  Modify.  Repeat. Fewer than half of all businesses can report on the performance on lead generation activities – which means they can’t redirect money from under-performing activities onto other, more productive activities.  Highly successful businesses have processes in place for measuring and analyzing performance and they constantly test new media, lists, messages, offers and creative presentation as well as the timing of communications and the combination of channels (does direct mail-call-email outperform direct mail-call-call-email?)

    That’s what separates highly effective lead generation processes from less effective campaigns – does this conjure up any ideas that will help you increase your performance?

    Related Articles:

    patmcgraw
    Pat McGraw founded [mcgraw | marketing] in 1999 in order to provide growth-oriented small businesses with hands-on services that increase sales and marketing performance. In addition to offering coaching, consulting and interim executive solutions to businesses, Pat has taught business and marketing courses at several colleges and universities and is a frequent speaker at conferences around the country.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Hi Daniel,

Good question - and I would suggest that instead of 'how many impressions', the focus should be placed on how much money you would be willing to invest in order to acquire the new customer based upon the life-time value of the customer.

Then, you invest that budget to test frequency, timing, channel, message, offer and creative in order to identify ways to lower your cost to acquire without negatively impacting life-time value.

Pat

Hi Pat-
With your contention that it takes 5-7 impressions to cut through the clutter... what is your take on impression caps?
What do you think the proper cap should be or what factors should go in when considering?

Thanks,
Dan

Jamie,

Thanks for a great reply - and I like the idea of breaking #1 into 2 pieces - Accuracy and Identify.

As for Frequency, I was attempting to address the all too common problem of "One and Done Campaigns." Successful marketing and sales organizations are always generating leads, while less successful organizations have a tendency to have start and stop dates. The problem with the start/stop approach is that when you stop, you 'go dark' and that means you are likely to be forgotten by the buyers.

Now, to your question concerning the 'best way to get someone's attention' - that depends on a variety of elements. (I am thinking back to the box of live lobsters one company sent me several years ago - it got my attention on the first try! Too bad I wasn't buying what they were selling.)

I love your 'no brainer' comment to #4 - and your own blog post seems to touch upon a prime example of "Quantity is everything - I gotta keep my salespeople busy!" Of course, the salespeople are busy being rejected 98 times out of 100, and they are being assigned a couple hundred new 'leads' every day (which no single person can ever possibly work properly) so the burn-out and turnover is crazy. And that leads to higher recruitment and training costs plus lost productivity and opportunity with a dash of bad customer experience tossed on top.

Let's connect by phone next week regarding your post!

Best,
Pat

Interesting write. When I came out to work at my last company, the reason I came was for the 'mission'. We offer degrees that are not only accessible, but affordable. Graduate degrees from state universities that are less than $5K and undergrad programs that can be covered by grants if student has an EFC of 0.

Thoroughly intrigued, I left my entire life (and 6 years at my prior company) to come out for this mission as well as to challenge myself to do something that, to my knowledge, had never been done before. I was to target no higher than a $500 CPE.

We chose to go with the "B2B" or "institutional sales" model first. We also chose to work with niche programs where we knew the low cost model woudl be welcomed. We worked in Masters in Ed and Nursing degrees. To your points above, it looks like we followed these, however also added another ingredient. We enrolled 5800 students with 16 admissions reps over 3 months at a $98 CPE. To outline / and ask some questions...

1. Accuracy - easy markets. The second point you have under accuracy is "discover your pitch" if you have not already or "discover your best sales tactic within a certain group. I would have actually made this point 2 and called it "Identify".

2. Frequency - what you write is true, however what is the best solution to get someone's attention? I didn't see any examples here.

3. Relevancy - love it. We used this tactic with our affinity agreements. For example, with teachers, we promoted through Scholastic (implied endorsement as well) and not only did we offer a full scholarship, but had Scholastic offer their products to teachers as well.

4. No brainer

5. Wow - scary fact! I can't imagine running a business without knowing my numbers.

I think you may find this blog post interesting and perhaps we can build on this together. This was an original B2B model that we turned into affinity partnerships...explained here: http://bizrelationships.wordpress.com/2010/01/2...

I actually didn't finish the article ( ; but will do so this evening or tomorrow. I'm interested in your response first.

Thank you for sharing!

© Pat McGraw 2008-12

Switch to our mobile site