<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Key Factors of Successful B2B Lead Generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/5-key-factors-of-successful-b2b-lead-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/5-key-factors-of-successful-b2b-lead-generation/</link>
	<description>Improving sales and marketing performance for small businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: patmcgraw</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/5-key-factors-of-successful-b2b-lead-generation/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>patmcgraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/?p=6710#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good question - and I would suggest that instead of &#039;how many impressions&#039;, the focus should be placed on how much money you would be willing to invest in order to acquire the new customer based upon the life-time value of the customer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then, you invest that budget to test frequency, timing, channel, message, offer and creative in order to identify ways to lower your cost to acquire without negatively impacting life-time value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel,</p>
<p>Good question &#8211; and I would suggest that instead of &#39;how many impressions&#39;, the focus should be placed on how much money you would be willing to invest in order to acquire the new customer based upon the life-time value of the customer.</p>
<p>Then, you invest that budget to test frequency, timing, channel, message, offer and creative in order to identify ways to lower your cost to acquire without negatively impacting life-time value.</p>
<p>Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danieledison</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/5-key-factors-of-successful-b2b-lead-generation/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>danieledison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/?p=6710#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>Hi Pat-&lt;br&gt;With your contention that it takes 5-7 impressions to cut through the clutter...  what is your take on impression caps?&lt;br&gt;What do you think the proper cap should be or what factors should go in when considering?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pat-<br />With your contention that it takes 5-7 impressions to cut through the clutter&#8230;  what is your take on impression caps?<br />What do you think the proper cap should be or what factors should go in when considering?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patmcgraw</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/5-key-factors-of-successful-b2b-lead-generation/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>patmcgraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com/?p=6710#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>Jamie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for a great reply - and I like the idea of breaking #1 into 2 pieces - Accuracy and Identify.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Frequency, I was attempting to address the all too common problem of &quot;One and Done Campaigns.&quot;  Successful marketing and sales organizations are always generating leads, while less successful organizations have a tendency to have start and stop dates.  The problem with the start/stop approach is that when you stop, you &#039;go dark&#039; and that means you are likely to be forgotten by the buyers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, to your question concerning the &#039;best way to get someone&#039;s attention&#039; - that depends on a variety of elements.  (I am thinking back to the box of live lobsters one company sent me several years ago - it got my attention on the first try!  Too bad I wasn&#039;t buying what they were selling.)  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love your &#039;no brainer&#039; comment to #4 - and your own blog post seems to touch upon a prime example of &quot;Quantity is everything - I gotta keep my salespeople busy!&quot;  Of course, the salespeople are busy being rejected 98 times out of 100, and they are being assigned a couple hundred new &#039;leads&#039; every day (which no single person can ever possibly work properly) so the burn-out and turnover is crazy.  And that leads to higher recruitment and training costs plus lost productivity and opportunity with a dash of bad customer experience tossed on top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s connect by phone next week regarding your post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie,</p>
<p>Thanks for a great reply &#8211; and I like the idea of breaking #1 into 2 pieces &#8211; Accuracy and Identify.</p>
<p>As for Frequency, I was attempting to address the all too common problem of &#8220;One and Done Campaigns.&#8221;  Successful marketing and sales organizations are always generating leads, while less successful organizations have a tendency to have start and stop dates.  The problem with the start/stop approach is that when you stop, you &#39;go dark&#39; and that means you are likely to be forgotten by the buyers.</p>
<p>Now, to your question concerning the &#39;best way to get someone&#39;s attention&#39; &#8211; that depends on a variety of elements.  (I am thinking back to the box of live lobsters one company sent me several years ago &#8211; it got my attention on the first try!  Too bad I wasn&#39;t buying what they were selling.)  </p>
<p>I love your &#39;no brainer&#39; comment to #4 &#8211; and your own blog post seems to touch upon a prime example of &#8220;Quantity is everything &#8211; I gotta keep my salespeople busy!&#8221;  Of course, the salespeople are busy being rejected 98 times out of 100, and they are being assigned a couple hundred new &#39;leads&#39; every day (which no single person can ever possibly work properly) so the burn-out and turnover is crazy.  And that leads to higher recruitment and training costs plus lost productivity and opportunity with a dash of bad customer experience tossed on top.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s connect by phone next week regarding your post!</p>
<p>Best,<br />Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 435/439 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.mcgrawmarketing.com @ 2012-02-06 19:11:43 -->
