You are here: Home » Strategy » Seven-Fingered Gloves

Seven-Fingered Gloves

by patmcgraw on June 1, 2010

Imagine if you were the most efficient manufacturer of seven-fingered gloves. You offer the best selection, the best service, and the best prices for seven-fingered gloves–but if there isn’t a big enough market for what you sell, you won’t get very far.

I love that quote. It comes from Tony Hsieh, CEO of Zappos and is part of a longer and very interesting post on Huffington Post.

Why do I love this quote? Because many will read that quote and wonder “Who the hell would make a 7-fingered glove?” – then they will get up and go to a meeting later in the day in order to discuss why their own company’s version of a seven-fingered glove is not hitting projected sales goals.

The blame will fall on marketing – specifically promotions that fail to deliver the quantity and quality of leads necessary to achieve sales goals. (Very aggressive sales goals that were based on ‘what do we want the company to earn’ rather than ‘what percentage of seven-gloved projected sales are we likely to capture?’)

Now, the blame should fall on “marketing” but only in those organizations that allow marketing to be involved (drive) product, price, place (distribution) and promotion. Because in those organizations, marketing decided that there was strong enough demand for seven-fingered gloves that the organization’s goals could be achieved.

But for too many organizations, marketing is assigned the ‘joyful, rewarding’ (sarcasm) job of trying to attract large numbers of qualified leads for products and services that don’t have large numbers of people that need the products and services.

How does your organization identify opportunities in the market and use that insight to develop the right products and services at the right price? How does your organization use that knowledge to execute a unique distribution strategy that brings your products and services to more qualified buyers?

Because when you do these things correctly, promotion becomes a lot easier and qualified buyers turn to you for their needs because more reasons than just promotion.

  • jamienachtfarrell

    I've watched CMOs, VPs, and Directors come and go – more turnover in marketing management than in any other dept (in higher ed). That said, this was mostly “lead generation” until recently (about 2 yrs ago) when many of the schools looked at UOP's branding and said, “hmmm….they must have something here”. Still, in my experiences in the last 2 companies I've consulted with and former company I worked with…Marketing was responsible for branding and leads; but there was usually a whole other dept. working on market research, pricing, etc. In those cases, why is it always the lead gen folks who take the blame? And why isn't it all under 1 dept?

  • http://www.mcgrawmarketing.com patmcgraw

    Jamie,

    Thanks for taking the time to read and respond to the post – and I hear ya!

    Personally, I love the focus on the brand while ignoring the product, pricing and distribution. (I believe the saying has something to do with lipstick and pigs.) But too many 'marketing' people are really more focused on colors and graphic standards instead of clearly identifying and understanding the target audience.

    Ahh well, it's easier to blame than it is to do it right…

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: